• Regulatory updates from the NAIC, EIOPA, SEC, and other regulators relevant to investment accounting.
  • Best practices and other considerations relating to investment data operations, based on Clearwater’s extensive experience and client base.
  • News and other updates on the latest innovations in the financial technology sector.
  • All about Clearwater: what is our company up to, and how can you best engage with our community of users.
5 MIN READ
MARKET INSIGHTS

Top 5 Items from the NAIC Spring 2021 National Meeting

Top 5 Items from the NAIC Spring 2021 National Meeting

MARKET INSIGHTS

Working groups held a series of conference calls in lieu of an in-person NAIC Spring 2021 National Meeting. Clearwater experts attended these calls to keep insurers updated on the latest regulatory guidance changes pertinent to investment accounting and reporting.

The following are five key updates from the NAIC Statutory Accounting Principles Working Group, Valuation of Securities Task Force, Blanks Working Group, and Capital Adequacy Task Force. For a more in-depth look at these and other items specific to investment accounting and reporting, read Clearwater's NAIC Spring 2021 National Meeting Update market insight paper.

Statutory Accounting Principles Working Group (SAPWG)

ADOPTED

Ref #2020-22: Accounting for Perpetual Bonds

Interested parties previously requested revisions clarifying that “perpetual bonds are within scope as a ‘bond,’ therefore shall apply the yield-to-worst concept (i.e., applicable premium or discount shall be amortized or accreted for perpetual bonds with an effective call option). Additionally, for perpetual bonds that do not possess or no longer possess a call feature, fair value reporting is required.” Additional revisions supplied with the most recent exposure recommended fine-tuning a new footnote to clarify that the yield-to-worst method would be used to amortize any applicable premium. 

NAIC staff recommended the working group adopt the revisions along with interested parties’ suggested edit to the footnote.

Valuation of Securities Task Force (VOSTF)

ADOPTED

Discuss Comments and Consider for Adoption an Updated Proposed Amendment to the Purposes and Procedures Manual of the NAIC Investment Analysis Office (P&P Manual) to Update the Financial Modeling Instructions tor RMBS/CMBS Securities and Direct IAO Staff to Produce NAIC Designation and NAIC Designations Categories for Non-Legacy Securities

IAO staff made a recommendation to the NAIC that all Non-Legacy Securities (those financially modelled Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities/Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities that closed on or after January 1, 2013) move to a single NAIC designation and NAIC designation category with no SVO Administrative Symbol, e.g., 3.C. This was first proposed by IAO staff in 2019, but the VOSTF opted to defer the change at a February 2020 meeting due to concerns from industry about significant adverse risk-based capital consequences.

The current practice provides a series of book adjusted carrying value price breakpoints to companies to determine the NAIC designation then map to the mid-point modifier. The effects of the 2020 pandemic on RMBS and CMBS securities in year-end financial modeling showed several securities no longer qualified as zero-loss because of the more conservative scenarios being applied to reflect the economic impact of the pandemic. As a result, these became subject to the book adjusted carrying value price breakpoints process.

After reviewing year-end 2020 modeling, industry and IAO staff agreed that the price break points caused insurer-owned securities with otherwise strong credit to be reported as NAIC 2, NAIC 3, and NAIC 4. This is because many of these securities are held at a premium due to the low-interest rate environment and received these designations because of their book adjusted carrying value and not for a credit concern.

During a December 2020 meeting of the VOSTF, there was discussion and concern that the current process was causing possible market disruptions. Moving away from financial modeling price breakpoints process for these non-Legacy Securities will avoid further and future market disruptions and permit a clearer assessment of the credit risk assessment for these securities that will not be impacted by their book adjusted carrying value.

Staff recommended a referral to the SAPWG because of potential impact to SSAP 43R - Loan-Backed and Structured Securities

There was dialog to see if some of the problematic breakpoints could be resolved in the future. The NAIC is open to identifying additional disclosures at a more granular level so an insurance company can better understand what was driving the problematic modeling.

This item was adopted for a 2021 implementation date. The date could change to 2022 if it is not able to be implemented from a technology standpoint, but that will be reviewed at a later date.

EXPOSED ITEM WITH COMMENT DEADLINE MAY 12, 2021

Discuss Comments Received and Consider for Adoption — An Updated Proposed Amendment to the P&P Manual to Require the Filing of Private Rating Letter Rationale Report 

In February 2020, the VOSTF exposed a memo from IAO staff expressing concerns over bespoke securities and the NAIC’s overreliance on credit rating provider ratings to assess investment risk and for regulatory purposes. The VOSTF then asked the SVO to make recommendations addressing these concerns.

Further, the Financial Condition (E) Committee directed VOSTF in October 2020 to include a new charge for 2021 to, “implement policies to oversee the NAIC’s staff administration of rating agency ratings used in NAIC processes, including, staff’s discretion over the applicability of their use in its administration of Filing Exemption.” 

As a result of these actions and concerns, the SVO proposed moving forward with implementation of some of its recommendations and increasing SVO scrutiny of PL (privately rated) securities. Many PL securities are bespoke securities. In a memo, the SVO had concerns that its lack of authority to use its judgment in determining whether a CRP rating is useful for NAIC purposes has led to an increase in the use of bespoke securities, many of which are assigned NAIC designations through the Filing Exempt (FE) process.

To receive an NAIC designation for PL securities, the SVO must receive the private rating letter and a rationale report that provides more in-depth analysis of the transaction, private rating methodology, as well as risks and mitigants. This information will allow the SVO to determine if the private credit rating is an Eligible NAIC CRP Rating and eligible to be reported on Schedule D. The SVO will also determine if it agrees with the private credit rating. If the SVO deems a PL security is ineligible for Filing Exemption or is outside the scope of SSAP No. 26R – Bonds, SSAP No. 32R – Preferred Stock, or SSAP No. 43R – Loan Backed and Structured Securities, the SVO will provide a brief explanation in VISION why the security will not be provided an NAIC Designation Category.

In November, the VOSTF directed the SVO to update its proposed amendment to have the rationale reports filed with SVO, but without the SVO’s discretion over evaluating the appropriateness of the rating or methodology utilized. A regulator-only call will be scheduled to review transactions that appear to be ineligible for filing exemption, Schedule D reporting or if there is a difference in opinion on risk.

The interested parties (American Council of Life Insurer (ACLI), North American Securities Valuation Association (NASVA), and Private Placement Investors Association (PPIA)) agree to increase the level of transparency and information sharing with the SVO and regulators to address potential concerns with bespoke securities by providing private rating letters, rating rationale reports and even the deal documents upon the SVO’s request if necessary. However, they also raised the practical challenges resulting from the contractual agreements between credit rating providers, insurers, and issuers. 

The insurers are not allowed to share ratings rationale reports with the SVO in accordance with the current agreements. For the PL securities issued between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2022, they will work to persuade issuers and credit rating providers to amend existing contractual agreements. However, they expect this process will take time and they will ensure the SVO is continually aware of their progress.

The SVO incorporated the edits by the interested parties and proposed amendments to Parts One and Three of the P&P Manual to require insurance company filers to provide private rating letter rationale reports for each PL security effective January 1, 2022. Insurers are required to report those PL securities issued between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2022, on the General Interrogatory (i.e., a PL GI security) if they cannot provide the SVO a copy of a rating rationale report due to confidentiality or contractual reasons. If there are no such limitations, the PL securities will be reported with a self-designated NAIC Designation Category of NAIC 5.B GI. 

Charles Therriault with the NAIC team is working with the taskforce to clean up the wording on some of the amendments and will release the changes for a 30-day exposure period.

Blanks Working Group (BWG)

ADOPTED ITEMS EFFECTIVE 2022 ANNUAL

2020-35BWG Modified — Expand the number of characters used from seven to ten in the investment line categories for Schedules D, DA, DL and E excluding Schedule D, Part 6 (Sections 1 and 2) and Schedule E (Part 1 and 3). Add line categories for Unaffiliated Certificates of Deposit and Exchange Traded Funds. Split the line categories for Mutual Funds, Investment Unit Trusts and Closed-End Funds into lines indicating if the fund has been assigned a designation by the Securities Valuation Office (SVO) or not. Make changes to Summary Investment Schedule, Summary by Country and Schedule D, Part 1A (Sections 1 and 2) to reflect the additional line categories. 

A proposal was made to change the line number size to accommodate more line categories and to allow for room in the numbering scheme for Schedules D, DA, DL, and E. The change allows additional lines to be added without disrupting the line numbering in the future. The proposal also addresses previously raised crosscheck issues and reporting questions. 

The adopted proposal: 

  • Expands the number of characters used from seven to ten in the investment line categories for Schedules D, DA, DL, and E, excluding Schedule D, Part 6 (Sections 1 and 2) and Schedule E (Part 1 and 3)
  • Removes Bond Mutual Funds from SVO Identified Funds Category 
  • Adds line categories for Unaffiliated Certificates of Deposit and Exchange Traded Funds 
  • Splits the line categories for Mutual Funds, Investment Unit Trusts and Closed-End Funds into lines indicating if the fund has been assigned a designation by the SVO or not 
  • Removes code “$” for Certificates of Deposits under the FDIC limit
  • Makes changes to the Summary Investment Schedule, Summary by Country and Schedule D, Part 1A (Sections 1 and 2) to reflect the additional line categories

This item is effective for 2022 quarterly reporting.

Capital Adequacy Task Force (CADTF)

ADOPTED ITEM 

Consider Adoption of Proposal 2020-10-CA Bond Structure for Health and P&C Insurers 

This item was exposed for a 45-day comment period in October 2020. It modifies the structure for the bonds to pull directly from the Book Adjusted Carrying Value Footnotes of Schedule D Part 1, Schedule DA Part 1, and Schedule E Part 2 for the 20 NAIC Designation Categories. It removes hybrid securities from equity assets pages, i.e., XR010 and PR007, and they will be included as a bond on the Bonds pages and asset concentration (i.e., XR012, PR011).

Our website uses cookies and forms for collecting data about our visitors and registered users. By clicking 'Agree and Close' you confirm that you have reviewed our Privacy Policy, and consent to the terms described.